Aggregate demand in the economy exhibited some improvement during Q2 of 2013-14 mainly
on account of a surge in net exports. However, total Consumption expenditure decelerated over
the previous quarter on account of a decline in government Consumption expenditure. Private Consumption expenditure, the mainstay of aggregate demand stayed low in the face of high
inflation with subdued discretionary demand. Investment demand improved somewhat during
the quarter but the investment Cycle is yet to witness a turnaround. On the whole, Corporate
sales improved during Q2, although some major industries Continued to experience Contraction
in sales. Overall aggregate demand is expected to receive support in H2 of 2013-14 due to
the favourable impact from rural demand and exports, though downside risks will emanate
from public spending Cuts. A pickup in demand in the Coming year depends Critically on the
successful resolution of bottlenecks facing infrastructure projects. It is also important to Create
a fiscal space in 2014-15 to support public investment by restraining revenue spending, so as
to Crowd-in private investment.
Exports propelled aggregate demand in Q2
of 2013-14
II.1 During Q2 of 2013-14, GDP at market
prices increased markedly to 5.6 per Cent as
against 2.4 per Cent in Q1. This essentially reflected increased taxes and decline in subsidies
due to deferment of outgo during the quarter.
As a result of this, the overall growth rate picked
up in H1 of 2013-14 as Compared with H1 of
last year (Table II.1).
Table II.1: Aggregate demand improved, although total final Consumption
expenditure decelerated during Q2 |
Expenditure-side GDP (2004-05 prices) |
(Per Cent) |
Item |
2011-12@ |
2012-13# |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
H1 |
H1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
Growth Rates (y-o-y) |
GDP at Market Prices |
6.3 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
2.5 |
4.1 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
5.6 |
2.9 |
4.0 |
Total Final Expenditure |
8.1 |
3.9 |
4.7 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
3.3 |
3.0 |
1.7 |
4.4 |
2.3 |
(i) Private |
8.0 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
4.2 |
3.8 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
3.9 |
1.9 |
(ii) Government |
8.6 |
3.9 |
7.2 |
6.9 |
2.2 |
0.6 |
10.5 |
-1.1 |
7.0 |
4.7 |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
4.4 |
1.7 |
-2.2 |
1.1 |
4.5 |
3.4 |
-1.2 |
2.6 |
-0.6 |
0.7 |
Change in Stocks |
-30.6 |
73.4 |
69.8 |
71.7 |
75.8 |
76.0 |
-0.4 |
2.3 |
70.7 |
0.9 |
Valuables |
6.6 |
-12.0 |
-20.9 |
4.3 |
-6.9 |
-20.2 |
92.5 |
23.9 |
-10.0 |
58.0 |
Net Exports |
-42.5 |
-17.3 |
-6.7 |
-21.4 |
-23.7 |
-16.4 |
-6.0 |
36.1 |
-14.1 |
16.4 |
Discrepancies |
-100.3 |
152.0 |
-12.9 |
28.6 |
-128.5 |
-6.3 |
29.1 |
40.6 |
4.6 |
35.1 |
|
Relative Shares |
Total Final Expenditure |
70.5 |
71.0 |
72.1 |
72.8 |
73.5 |
65.9 |
72.5 |
70.1 |
72.5 |
71.3 |
(i) Private |
59.2 |
59.6 |
61.1 |
61.8 |
61.4 |
54.7 |
60.6 |
59.8 |
61.5 |
60.2 |
(ii) Government |
11.3 |
11.3 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
12.1 |
11.2 |
11.9 |
10.3 |
11.0 |
11.1 |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
33.7 |
33.2 |
33.8 |
34.6 |
32.0 |
32.6 |
32.6 |
33.6 |
34.2 |
33.1 |
Change in Stocks |
2.3 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
4.0 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
Valuables |
2.4 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
4.0 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
3.3 |
Net Exports |
-8.8 |
-10.0 |
-9.6 |
-11.0 |
-11.3 |
-8.4 |
-9.9 |
-6.6 |
-10.3 |
-8.3 |
Discrepancies |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-2.4 |
-2.6 |
0.1 |
4.2 |
-3.0 |
-3.4 |
-2.5 |
-3.2 |
Memo: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP at market prices (` billion) |
56314 |
58137 |
13702 |
13536 |
15062 |
15836 |
14034 |
14301 |
27238 |
28335 |
@: First Revised Estimates;
#: Provisional Estimates.
Source: Central Statistics Office. |
II.2 The pickup in growth in Q2 of 2013-14
essentially emanated from a surge in exports
driven by the impact of rupee depreciation and
improved growth in advanced economies. The Contribution of exports to growth was placed at
4.1 percentage points in Q2, which was
substantially higher than other Components on
the expenditure side (Table II.2). Gross fixed Capital formation and private final Consumption
expenditure (PFCE) increased marginally while
government final Consumption expenditure
(GFCE) declined during the period. Further, the
growth rate of spending on valuables decelerated
distinctly in Q2 as Compared with Q1 reflecting
moderation in gold imports.
Efforts to address infrastructure
bottlenecks gain momentum, though
revival of activity on the ground has been
modest so far
II.3 The Cabinet Committee on Investment
(CCI) (January 2013) and later the Project
Monitoring Group (PMG) (June 2013) were Constituted by the government to expedite key
mega projects. So far the CCI has helped in the
resolution of logjams for around 300 projects,
worth above `5 trillion. The PMG alone has
accepted 411 projects worth `19 trillion for Consideration; of these issues relating to projects worth `4.9 trillion (138 projects) have been
resolved. A majority of these resolved projects
are in power (86), Coal (21), petroleum (7),
roads and railways (6 each) and shipping (5).
The new legislation for Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement has been
enacted with an objective to fast track stalled
infrastructure projects. In addition, a series of
measures, including delinking of environmental Clearance from forest Clearances, encouraging
infrastructure debt funds and enhancing Credit
to infrastructure Companies, initiated by the
government during January-September 2013
are likely to boost infrastructure investments in
general in the Coming months. However, the
time and Cost overrun for Central sector
infrastructure projects (of `1.5 billion and
above) Continues to be high.
Table II.2: Exports played a major role in increasing overall growth |
Contribution-weighted growth rates on the expenditure side GDP (2004-05 prices)* |
(Per Cent) |
Item |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
H1 |
H1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
1. |
Private Final Consumption Expenditure |
2.6 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
2.1 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
2. |
Government Final Consumption Expenditure |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
1.2 |
-0.1 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
3. |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
-0.8 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
-0.4 |
0.9 |
-0.2 |
0.2 |
4. |
Change in Stocks |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
5. |
Valuables |
-0.6 |
0.1 |
-0.2 |
-0.5 |
2.0 |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
1.2 |
6. |
Net Exports (i-ii) |
-0.6 |
-2.0 |
-2.3 |
-1.2 |
-0.6 |
4.0 |
-1.3 |
1.7 |
|
(i) Exports |
3.0 |
1.2 |
-0.9 |
-0.2 |
-0.3 |
4.1 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
|
(ii) Less Imports |
3.6 |
3.2 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
3.4 |
0.2 |
7. |
Sum 1 to 6 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
6.7 |
3.1 |
4.9 |
8. |
Discrepancies |
0.4 |
-0.6 |
0.6 |
-0.3 |
-0.7 |
-1.1 |
-0.1 |
-0.9 |
9. |
GDP at Market Prices (7+8) |
3.4 |
2.5 |
4.1 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
5.6 |
2.9 |
4.0 |
*: Contribution-weighted growth rate of a Component of expenditure-side GDP is obtained as: y-o-y Change in the Component ÷ y-o-y Change in GDP at Constant market prices × y-o-y growth rate of GDP at Constant market prices.
Source: Central Statistics Office. |
II.4 The performance of power generation
during April-November 2013 was somewhat
better than last year; mainly supported by
increased hydel power generation on account
of good rainfall and consequent high reservoir
levels. Notwithstanding some improvement in
coal supply position, the Plant Load Factor
(PLF) in the thermal power sector at 65.4 per
cent in November 2013 remains lower than 71.0
per cent last year due to moderation in demand
in line with slowdown in economic activity
(Chart II.1).
II.5 The government has been taking
initiatives to revive the telecom sector. These
include introduction of the National Telecom
Policy 2012, simplifying the licensing regime,
improving availability of spectrum and its
allocation and raising the limit on foreign direct
investment (FDI) in this sector from 74 per cent
to 100 per cent. The Union Cabinet recently
approved the finalisation of the reserve price for
auction of spectrum in 1,800 MHz band for all
service areas and for 900 MHz band in metro
areas, which is likely to provide some impetus
to telecom services.
II.6 In the roads sector, in the absence of an
encouraging response from private developers,
the government has shifted its focus of awarding
road projects through ‘Engineering, Procurement
and Construction’ (EPC). However, given the
tight fiscal situation of the government, the
sustainability of this approach requires a
significant repurposing of government spending.
Against this backdrop, the government has been
organising investors’ conclaves/road shows in
major centres abroad to promote infrastructure
financing.
Corporate investment intentions showed
nominal improvement
II.7 Corporate investment intentions in Q2
of 2013-14 showed some improvement over
Q1. However, it still remained much lower than the level achieved in Q2 of 2012-13.
Improvement in projects investment in Q2 of
2013-14 was observed for metal & metal
products (Table II.3).
Aggregate sales growth (y-o-y) improved
but profit margins low
II.8 Sales growth (y-o-y) of non-government non-financial listed companies improved in Q2 of 2013-14 after successive deceleration since Q3 of 2011-12. The upturn in sales growth was noticeable for the manufacturing and the IT sectors, while the slowdown continued in the non-IT services sector. Industries like fertilisers, coke & refined petroleum products, textiles and pharmaceuticals witnessed decent improvement in sales growth. However, the contraction continued in some major industries, such as motor vehicles, machinery, cement and iron & steel. The improvement in sales growth was, however, not reflected in profit growth. Pricing power in terms of EBITDA and net profit margins declined in Q2 of 2012-13 as compared with the previous quarter (Table II.4). Early results for Q3 of 2013-14, from 194 companies show y-o-y sales growth at 12.4 per cent and EBITDA growth at 14.8 per cent.
Table II.3: Institutionally assisted project
investments showed marginal improvement |
Institutionally assisted projects and their envisaged cost (Quarter-wise)* |
(` billion) |
Financial Year |
No. of Projects |
Envisaged Cost (Total) |
of which |
Power industries |
Metal & metal
products industries |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2011-12 |
Q1 |
147 |
749 |
284 |
231 |
|
Q2 |
184 |
452 |
218 |
23 |
|
Q3 |
137 |
462 |
242 |
14 |
|
Q4 |
168 |
253 |
69 |
46 |
2012-13 |
Q1 |
110 |
413 |
240 |
36 |
|
Q2 |
132 |
666 |
207 |
145 |
|
Q3 |
89 |
256 |
157 |
15 |
|
Q4 |
94 |
629 |
187 |
352 |
2013-14 |
Q1 |
96 |
254 |
76 |
17 |
|
Q2 |
116 |
321 |
70 |
131 |
*: Data are provisional and may undergo changes due to modification/cancellation of
projects if reported subsequently.
Note: based on data reported by 39 banks/FIs usually active in project finance. |
Table II.4: Corporate sales have improved during the quarter |
Performance of non-government, non-financial companies |
(Per cent) |
|
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
No. of Companies |
2353 |
|
Growth rates (y-o-y) |
Sales |
11.9 |
10.0 |
4.7 |
3.3 |
7.6 |
Value of Production |
12.4 |
8.6 |
4.8 |
2.7 |
6.9 |
Expenditure, of which |
12.7 |
8.6 |
5.5 |
2.8 |
8.2 |
Raw Materials |
14.4 |
9.3 |
3.1 |
-1.5 |
6.2 |
Staff Cost |
15.5 |
13.6 |
13.8 |
12.0 |
14.1 |
Power & Fuel |
21.3 |
11.1 |
3.5 |
-0.2 |
0.6 |
Operating Profits (EBITDA) |
10.5 |
8.7 |
0.2 |
2.3 |
-1.0 |
Other Income* |
44.8 |
-0.8 |
4.0 |
26.3 |
0.1 |
Depreciation |
10.0 |
10.3 |
8.3 |
8.5 |
11.7 |
Gross Profits (EBIT) |
17.0 |
6.4 |
-1.1 |
5.1 |
-4.2 |
Interest |
11.2 |
17.3 |
11.1 |
10.5 |
20.8 |
Tax Provision |
9.2 |
6.2 |
-2.5 |
2.9 |
4.4 |
Net Profits |
19.0 |
23.4 |
-13.5 |
-8.1 |
-19.9 |
|
Ratios in per cent |
Interest Burden |
26.9 |
32.3 |
29.8 |
33.5 |
34.0 |
EBITDA to Sales |
13.4 |
12.9 |
12.8 |
12.9 |
12.4 |
EBIT to Sales |
12.8 |
11.4 |
11.9 |
12.0 |
11.4 |
Net Profit to Sales |
7.1 |
5.8 |
5.9 |
5.4 |
5.3 |
*: Other income excludes extraordinary income/expenditure if
reported explicitly. |
Central government’s key deficit indicators
continue to rule high
II.9 The key deficit indicators of the central
government during April-November 2013 as
percentages to their budget estimates (BE) were
the highest for the comparable period in the last
five years (Chart II.2). During April-November
2013, the revenue deficit of the central
government had already breached the BE and
reached 103.5 per cent of BE for the full year,
mainly on account of a sharp increase in revenue
expenditure. The widening of revenue deficit,
coupled with higher capital expenditure resulted
in a gross fiscal deficit of 93.9 per cent of BE
during April-November 2013.
Growth slowdown affecting tax collections
II.10 The central government’s gross tax
revenue as per cent of BE was lower than a year
ago, with a deceleration in revenue growth for
income tax and service tax, and a decline in
union excise duties during April-November
2013. Although corporation tax during the
period registered a higher growth than last year,
it was lower than budget estimates (Chart II.3).
Challenging task ahead for government to
meet deficit targets in the face of higher
expenditures
II.11 Total expenditure as a per cent of budget
estimates in April-November 2013 was higher
than a year ago, with both the revenue and
capital expenditure contributing to the increase
(Table II.5). Plan expenditure was significantly
higher, both in terms of BE as well as growth
rates, with a notable increase in expenditure on transport, and rural and urban development.
Grants to states/UTs under central and centrally
sponsored schemes were also higher in terms
of BE than a year ago.
Table II.5: Expenditure growth has been higher than revenue growth |
Central government finances during April-November 2013 |
(In ` billion) |
Item |
Amount |
Percentage to Budget Estimates |
Growth Rate (per cent) |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1. Revenue Receipts (i+ii) |
4458.2 |
5026.9 |
47.6 |
47.6 |
13.5 |
12.8 |
i) Tax Revenue (Net) |
3696.0 |
3961.7 |
47.9 |
44.8 |
15.3 |
7.2 |
ii) Non-Tax Revenue |
762.2 |
1065.3 |
46.3 |
61.8 |
5.4 |
39.8 |
2. Non-Debt Capital Receipts |
89.0 |
89.5 |
21.4 |
13.5 |
-38.7 |
0.5 |
3. Non -Plan Expenditure |
6242.6 |
7302.0 |
64.4 |
65.8 |
15.7 |
17.0 |
of which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) Interest Payments |
1828.6 |
2144.3 |
57.2 |
57.8 |
10.2 |
17.3 |
ii) Food Subsidies |
620.0 |
749.1 |
82.7 |
83.2 |
40.7 |
20.8 |
iii) Fertiliser Subsidies |
552.9 |
530.8 |
90.7 |
80.5 |
22.8 |
-4.0 |
iv) Petroleum Subsidies |
403.2 |
548.7 |
92.5 |
84.4 |
73.0 |
36.1 |
4. Plan Expenditure |
2433.9 |
2909.9 |
46.7 |
52.4 |
10.0 |
19.6 |
5. Revenue Expenditure |
7653.2 |
8957.1 |
59.5 |
62.4 |
13.7 |
17.0 |
6. Capital Expenditure |
1023.3 |
1254.9 |
50.0 |
54.8 |
17.0 |
22.6 |
7. Total Expenditure |
8676.5 |
10212.0 |
58.2 |
61.3 |
14.1 |
17.7 |
8. Revenue Deficit |
3195.0 |
3930.2 |
91.2 |
103.5 |
13.9 |
23.0 |
9. Gross Fiscal Deficit |
4129.3 |
5095.6 |
80.4 |
93.9 |
16.9 |
23.4 |
10. Gross Primary Deficit |
2300.7 |
2951.2 |
118.7 |
171.8 |
22.7 |
28.3 |
Source: Controller General of Accounts, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. |
Need to strive for a deft balance between
fiscal consolidation and economic growth
by focusing on quality of government
spending
II.12 Notwithstanding the widening of GFD
in the first eight months of the current fiscal, the
government has reiterated its commitment to
meeting the budgetary target of 4.8 per cent of
GDP in 2013-14. This may require further
cutbacks in expenditure if the revenue and non-debt
capital receipts do not meet budgetary
targets. The additional provisions made for
meeting subsidy payments this year may not be
adequate to cover the gap between costs and
administered prices of OMCs and fertiliser
companies during 2013-14. In this milieu, it is
important to focus on fiscal consolidation,
keeping its quality uppermost in consideration.
As per the amended FRBM rules, GFD/GDP
ratio of the centre needs to be brought down by
at least 0.5 percentage points each year to reach
3.0 per cent in 2016-17. The task remains
challenging and, inter alia, will require poorly targeted subsidies such as cooking gas and
diesel (centre) and electricity (states) to be
rationalised. The progress in this direction so
far has been partial. While diesel prices have
been increased steadily, subsidy on gas cylinders
remains large. Adhering to fiscal discipline
hinges upon the ability to withstand pressures
to increase subsidies, including those on fuel
and public utilities. The power sector still needs
to make progress on full recovery of costs while
needing more investment.
Aggregate demand expected to recover in
the near term
II.13 Aggregate demand increased during Q2
of 2013-14. In order to sustain it through H2 of
2013-14, support will be required from
investment demand, as government final
consumption expenditure may remain subdued
in the face of policy-induced expenditure
compression to meet fiscal deficit targets. The
revival of large stalled projects cleared by the
CCI is expected to provide necessary impetus
to investments towards the close of the year.
There has been significant deceleration in
valuables with curbs on gold imports and this
is expected to positively impact household
financial savings and help restrain CAD.
|